Yes and about 48 of them were before the new voting system.  I used to
have a hit percent of near 50% - now it is about 5%

-- 
Bruce


Tuesday, August 28, 2007, 12:39:16 PM, you wrote:

pcn> It's obvious you're being discriminated against. You have a
pcn> mere 50 pics on the site:-)) !!!
pcn>  -------------- Original message ----------------------
pcn> From: Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Probably just my own complaining, but I do continue to see a large
>> slant towards outdoor (scenic) and street photography.  One real downside to
>> 'artists' voting before the judges even get a crack at it, is those
>> biases can come out.  For example, after seeing about 400 dragonflies
>> and butterflies I tend to be a little harsher in my judgements.  I
>> also tend to be a little critical of photos of art - statues,
>> paintings, etc.  As near as I can tell from timing of
>> acceptance/rejection, it appears that there is a tally of votes on a
>> photo - when it reaches a threshold of either accept or reject, the
>> photo is taken out of the voting.  The rejects are simply rejected
>> without judge intervention and the accepted are then put on hold (not
>> actual status) waiting for the judges to decide.
>> 
>> So technically excellent studio or wedding work will largely go
>> unnoticed unless it involves a beautiful girl.
>> 
>> Case in point - I had submitted the recent bridal portrait shot I show
>> here, prior to showing on the list.  It was rejected within hours -
>> which would indicate the judges had not even seen it (the judges take
>> much longer to get to a photo than that - usually days).  I then
>> showed it on list here and got a very strong positive response to it
>> from people I would consider pretty critical.  So I decided to
>> resubmit it to see what would happen.  This time it took a little
>> longer to reject, but it did get rejected in a time frame that would
>> lead me to believe the judges did not see it.
>> 
>> I guess the real problem with a gallery like that is no one wants to
>> see quality work of other humans unless then know them.  Since they
>> don't know them, it needs to be more like a NG shot of a beggar or a
>> small child which all of us relate to.
>> 
>> Anyway, just some thoughts.
>> 
>> -- 
>> Bruce
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net





-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to