Scott Loveless wrote: >On 11/25/09, Mark Roberts <[email protected]> wrote: >> The issue here is that one of the parties is lying: Either Apple's >> lying about how much contamination there is in the computer or the >> customer is lying about the extent of the computer's exposure to >> tobacco smoke. > >That's not the issue. Apple's not claiming the smoke damaged the >device. They're claiming that it's too dangerous for their panty >waist techs to work on it.
It's still a difference in how smoke-contaminated the computer really is. Apple says "a lot", the customer claims "very little". One of 'em's lying. Expect a court to decide. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
