On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 01:35:16PM -0800, Larry Colen wrote:
> 
> Speaking of equipment versus skill at cooking, I absolutely love my Le Cruset 
> cookware.
. . .
> Not only does it have all the advantages of cast iron for cooking, but I've 
> found the surface to be easier to clean and more durable than either teflon 
> or calphalon.

I'm not a purist, so I clean my pans in the dishwasher.  It doesn't get much 
easier than that.
I wasn't too impressed by Calphalon, but several years ago I switched to using 
Anolon Advanced
(some stainless steel, some hard-anodized aluminium), and I'm still happy with 
that decision.

But this is another one of those personal decisions.  For me, the cost/benefit 
ratio is about
right at the price point I chose ($50 - $100 for a typical mid-range pan). But 
I can quite
see that for some people that's pretty expensive, while for other people the 
high-end stuff
(copper saute pans, etc.) is worth the nosebleed prices.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to