Sung,

"An end as well as a cause" is what we usually call a "final cause", in the 
neo-Aristotelian analysis, and Stan Salthe has been for years been arguing that 
the Second Law of thermodynamics is the final cause of just about everything 
everything. Not everyone agrees with that, but the idea of "final cause", 
"purpose", "telos" or whatever we call it is widely deployed in ecology and 
biosemiotics these days. Tori's "pure telicism," as Ben called it, is another 
story; her proposal to call telos "objective" is unusual, and the idea of 
replacing the concept of "object of a sign" with it is even more unusual.

gary f.

-----Original Message-----
From: Sungchul Ji [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: 31-Mar-14 2:10 PM
To: Gary Fuhrman
Cc: Peirce List
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Objects, Objectives, Objectivity

Ben, Gary F, Lists,

According to I. Prigogine (1917-2003), thermodynamic decay (i.e., irreversibile 
processes) is essnetial for constructing dissipative structures (e.g., the 
flame of a candle, action potentials, organisms, EEG,  societies, etc.).  He 
gave two lectures at Rutgers in the 1980's under the title

"The Consructive Role of Irreversible Processes.

This may be interpreted (poetically ?) to mean that thermodynamic decay is an 
end as well as a cause (of dissipative structures).

With all the best.

Sung

-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L 
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To 
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the 
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .




Reply via email to