Søren, Charles and list,

The argument Peirce gives about the logical conception of the self in "Question 
Concerning Certain Faculties" is about the development of the self.  In his 
later works, Peirce makes it clear that the example of a child developing a 
logical conception of self is meant to help us explore what is requisite for 
the evolution of the self and the related capacities for self control more 
generally. (CP, 7.381-4)

The story we might tell in the special sciences of physics, chemistry, biology 
and psychology about the development of self-organizing and autopoietic systems 
shouldn't be used in a normative theory of logic as a basis for developing our 
logical hypotheses.  In time, we'll want to reconcile the account of the self 
developed in our logical theory with the accounts given in the special 
sciences, but we should be wary of getting the cart before the horse.  (CP, 
7.581)

We could, of course, disagree with Peirce on this point, and there are many who 
do.  For my part, however, I think there is much to be said for trying to avoid 
importing assumptions into the normative sciences that will tend to bias our 
inquiry.



--Jeff



Jeff Downard
Associate Professor
Department of Philosophy
NAU
(o) 523-8354
________________________________
From: Søren Brier [sb....@cbs.dk]
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2014 5:52 AM
To: charles murray; Peirce List
Subject: SV: SV: [PEIRCE-L] De Waal seminar chapter 9, section on Mind, self, 
and person

Charles and list

But section 9.4 is not really about the definition of  how subjects are 
created. But it is clear for me that Peirce saw the creation of the subject as 
a dialogical awareness of the limits of knowing. This creation is connected 
somehow to the development of an individual body (a bodyhood) as mind and 
matter are deeply connected through the semiotic process. In modern term for 
this process is a self-organizing process creating an autopoietic unit, or what 
you could call an autoposemiotic unit, which is what Peirce calls a symbol. 
This symbol is a limited model of the huge argument that the universe is. We 
thus have this deep inner connection to the universe we have evolved from.

  Cheers
                       Søren

Fra: charles murray [mailto:charlesmur...@charter.net]
Sendt: 31. maj 2014 14:24
Til: Peirce List
Emne: Re: SV: [PEIRCE-L] De Waal seminar chapter 9, section on Mind, self, and 
person

Soren -
In writing you I took the subject to be section 9.4, discussion of which you 
might facilitate as emcee of chapter 9 as a whole.  I apologize for any 
inconvenience or awkwardness, and appreciate your response.
Best,
Charles

On May 29, 2014, at 12:42 PM, Søren Brier wrote:


I did read this long post and in the end I did not find a question for me and 
my subject. So what question did you mean?

  Søren

-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L 
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To 
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the 
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .




Reply via email to