Jon wrote: *This normative aspect has as much, maybe more, to do with the social rooting of logic as the communicative or descriptive aspect, and [. . .] may help to explain the double or mutually recursive rooting of logic and the larger self in one another.*
I fully agree. Excellent point! The normative aspect of the social principle and logic rooting themselves in each other could no doubt be fleshed out to some advantage, I would think. Certainly something to reflect on. . . Best, Gary Best, Gary *Gary Richmond* *Philosophy and Critical Thinking* *Communication Studies* *LaGuardia College of the City University of New York* On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Jon Awbrey <[email protected]> wrote: > Gary, List, > > I think it's good to remember that Peirce defines Logic as Formal Semiotic, > elsewhere explaining Formal as implying Normative. This normative aspect > has > as much, maybe more, to do with the social rooting of logic as the > communicative or descriptive aspect, and, come to think of it as I write, > may > help to explain the double or mutually recursive rooting of logic and the > larger self in one another. > > Jon > > > ----------------------------- > PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON > PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to > [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L > but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the > BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm > . > > > > > >
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
