Dear Ben, On 29/03/15 17:42, Benjamin Udell wrote:
In reading your links, I didn't seen an emphasis on abduction's plausibility as naturalness and simplicity, though you did seem to accept such ideas in one of your messages to peirce-l.
I discuss abduction in section 3.4 entitled "Anapoiesis and abduction -- the mind" of the following paper:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002251931500106X I am seeking feedback on that. Danko -- Prof. Dr. Danko Nikolić Web: http://www.danko-nikolic.com Mail address 1: Department of Neurophysiology Max Planck Institut for Brain Research Deutschordenstr. 46 60528 Frankfurt am Main GERMANY Mail address 2: Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies Wolfgang Goethe University Ruth-Moufang-Str. 1 60433 Frankfurt am Main GERMANY ---------------------------- Office: (..49-69) 96769-736 Lab: (..49-69) 96769-209 Fax: (..49-69) 96769-327 [email protected] ----------------------------
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
