Jerry R: Thank you for your thoughts.
We seem to operate on different wave lengths. The purpose of poising a specific question was to seek specific suggestions. As I understand your approach, you appear to have a well-honed set of philosophical generalities which are, for your purposes, applicable universally. So, I suggest we not waste list-reader’s time and close out this thread. Cheers Jerry > On Jun 17, 2016, at 3:22 PM, Jerry Rhee <[email protected]> wrote: > > Jerry C, list: > > > The propositional functions are embedded but you have to recognize the beauty > to induce the labor. > > > “The little matter of distinguishing one, two, and three --in a word, number > and calculation: --do not all arts and sciences necessarily partake of them? > Yes.” ~Republic > > > “This difficulty is to some extent overcome by the fact that one virtue is > the highest, and that virtue is called knowledge or science… by conceiving of > knowledge as the calculation of pleasures. We all seek only pleasure, that > is the assumption. We want a maximum of pleasure without any moral > conversion, merely by greater shrewdness and calculation, i.e., by greater > intelligence, by science, a calculus of pleasures. This is the theme of the > Protagoras.” > > ~Leo Strauss on Plato’s Symposium > > > one, two, three…love of honor, love of goodness, love of truth…logic of icon, > logic of index, logic of symbol… > > > > Hth, > > Jerry Rhee > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Jerry LR Chandler > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Jerry R: > > >> On Jun 16, 2016, at 11:47 PM, Jerry Rhee <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Does this qualify? >> >> C = phi spiral and not M51, poet, promise >> A = FEM model and not Netlogo, scientist, >> performance >> B = Structural optimization of corneal stroma, philosopher, truth >> > > Your attempts to decipher the meaning of this critical logic term by throwing > conjectures at it are a most unusual approach, to say the least. > > May I suggest you take a day or two and study the origin and meaning of the > term “propositional function”? Such a study could add substantially to your > understanding of your own work. > > Cheers > Jerry C. > > > >> Best, >> Jerry R >> >> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:44 PM, Jerry LR Chandler >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> Hi Jerry R: >>> On Jun 16, 2016, at 1:57 PM, Jerry Rhee <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> I've never read FS but if the question is what is it that is being >>> interpreted by two different interpreters for that which is claimed to be >>> different but assumed to belong to the same whole, then you ought to >>> consider the following from Strauss, Bloom and Benardete: >>> >> >> >> Thank you for considering the query. >> >> But, that is not my question. >> >> I seek a premise, a propositional function. >> >> Cheers >> >> Jerry >> >> >> ----------------------------- >> PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON >> PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> . To UNSUBSCRIBE, >> send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the >> BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm >> <http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm> . >> >> >> >> > > > > ----------------------------- > PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON > PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] > . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] > with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at > http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm . > > > >
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
