Sounds good Jerry C. I will simply leave you with:
*"I have never found divisions of signs (trichotomies) of much use. And I cannot see how they could work with proposisional functions. So I cannot be of help in your questions.* *Kirsti"* Best, Jerry R On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Jerry LR Chandler < [email protected]> wrote: > Jerry R: > > Thank you for your thoughts. > > We seem to operate on different wave lengths. > > The purpose of poising a specific question was to seek specific > suggestions. > > As I understand your approach, you appear to have a well-honed set of > philosophical generalities which are, for your purposes, applicable > universally. > > So, I suggest we not waste list-reader’s time and close out this thread. > > Cheers > > Jerry > > > > On Jun 17, 2016, at 3:22 PM, Jerry Rhee <[email protected]> wrote: > > Jerry C, list: > > > The propositional functions are embedded but you have to recognize the > beauty to induce the labor. > > > “The little matter of distinguishing one, two, and three --in a word, > number and *calculation*: --do not all arts and sciences necessarily > partake of them? Yes.” ~Republic > > > “This difficulty is to some extent overcome by the fact that one virtue is > the highest, and that virtue is called knowledge or science… by conceiving > of knowledge as the *calculation* of pleasures. We all seek only > pleasure, that is the assumption. We want a maximum of pleasure without > any moral conversion, merely by greater shrewdness and calculation, i.e., > by greater intelligence, by science, a calculus of pleasures. This is the > theme of the *Protagoras*.” > > ~Leo Strauss on Plato’s Symposium > > > one, two, three…love of honor, love of goodness, love of truth…logic of > icon, logic of index, logic of symbol… > > > Hth, > > Jerry Rhee > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Jerry LR Chandler < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Jerry R: >> >> >> On Jun 16, 2016, at 11:47 PM, Jerry Rhee <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Does this qualify? >> >> C = phi spiral and not M51, poet, >> promise >> A = FEM model and not Netlogo, scientist, >> performance >> B = Structural optimization of corneal stroma, philosopher, truth >> >> >> Your attempts to decipher the meaning of this critical logic term by >> throwing conjectures at it are a most unusual approach, to say the least. >> >> May I suggest you take a day or two and study the origin and meaning of >> the term “propositional function”? Such a study could add substantially to >> your understanding of your own work. >> >> Cheers >> Jerry C. >> >> >> >> Best, >> Jerry R >> >> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:44 PM, Jerry LR Chandler < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Jerry R: >>> >>> On Jun 16, 2016, at 1:57 PM, Jerry Rhee <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I've never read FS but if the question is *what is it that is being >>> interpreted by two different interpreters for that which is claimed to be >>> different but assumed to belong to the same whol*e, then you ought to >>> consider the following from Strauss, Bloom and Benardete: >>> >>> >>> Thank you for considering the query. >>> >>> But, that is not my question. >>> >>> I seek a premise, a propositional function. >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> Jerry >>> >> >> >> ----------------------------- >> PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON >> PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to >> [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L >> but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the >> BODY of the message. More at >> http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm . >> >> >> >> >> >> > > ----------------------------- > PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON > PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to > [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L > but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the > BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm > . > > > > > >
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
