Jon: > On Dec 14, 2018, at 5:05 PM, Jon Alan Schmidt <[email protected]> > wrote: (From EP 2:203-204) > > In addition however to denoting objects, every sign sufficiently complete > signifies characters, or qualities
But what is the meaning of this phrase? In particular, when can we distinguish between a sign that is “sufficiently complete” and another sign, very very similar to the first, that is not sufficient complete? It is often the case, in the categorization of sign, that a “sufficiently complete” is exactly the same in all physical measurements yet differs from one that is not sufficiently complete. (In a direct example, CSP commented on the Pasteur’s left and right handed crystals.) Any ideas on how to make this a stronger argument? Cheers Jerry
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
