Stephen Frost wrote:

> Thanks!  I've gone over this and made quite a few documentation and
> comment updates, but not too much else, so I'm pretty happy with how
> this is coming along.  As mentioned elsewhere, this conflicts with the
> GetUserId() to has_privs_of_role() cleanup, but as I anticipate handling
> both this patch and that one, I'll find some way to manage. :)
> 
> Updated patch attached.  Barring objections, I'll be moving forward with
> this soonish.  Would certainly appreciate any additional testing or
> review that you (or anyone!) has time to provide.

I thought I saw a comment about using underscore to separate words in
privilege names, such as EXCLUSIVE_BACKUP rather than running it all
together.  Was that idea discarded?


-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to