Tom Lane wrote: > I was originally thinking of somehow migrating the executable build > rules into a single pattern rule, but given the lack of any suffix on > executable names it's not clear how to use a pattern rule for the > purpose.
You can write a rule for that using %: %.o but... > And the existing rules are diverse enough that it might be > a real pain to construct such a pattern rule anyway. ...is the problem. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
