Tom Lane wrote:
> I was originally thinking of somehow migrating the executable build
> rules into a single pattern rule, but given the lack of any suffix on
> executable names it's not clear how to use a pattern rule for the
> purpose.

You can write a rule for that using

%: %.o


> And the existing rules are diverse enough that it might be
> a real pain to construct such a pattern rule anyway. the problem.

Peter Eisentraut

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?


Reply via email to