Le 10/01/2014 11:18, Igor Stasenko a écrit :
On 10 January 2014 10:47, Goubier Thierry <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Le 10/01/2014 10:41, kilon alios a écrit : I agree this is an excellent way to educate people at worse they can become pyromaniacs. And in a case I know, the fire burn was so high the kid lost two fingers for life and all memories of the incident :( Well, if this is the analogy we're working with, I'll keep that dialog (even if I find it quite annoying)... The implications of the reverse attitude has just freaked me off. Taking extreme sides of a spectrum does not invalidates the rule. You want to prevent such accidents from happening, then you should be around to have a controlled experiment and be able to always abort it if something will go wrong. That's is your responsibility as parent. Same rule applies to all teachers, trainers and instructors... I wonder why i should state such trivialities, like nobody else knowing them.
And we are back at the point. If you don't provide or ensure an controlled experiment, then the dialog stays.
And of course I have to push at the extrem of your analogy to see where you stand :)
Thierry -- Thierry Goubier CEA list Laboratoire des Fondations des Systèmes Temps Réel Embarqués 91191 Gif sur Yvette Cedex France Phone/Fax: +33 (0) 1 69 08 32 92 / 83 95
