> But why keep kicking a dead horse, it just brings strife and makes the 
group look ridiculous?

Because then, this vote fails due to "people deliberately avoiding 
answering *crucial* questions, like 'what is the role of a secretary' on 
FIG 3.0". This is why everything apparently needs to be explained to 
exhaustion.

There are people in this list whose modus operandi is to question every 
little thing so, when some minor non-issue goes unnoticed, they can claim 
things weren't properly explained, thus creating the appearance that there 
are still a lot of unresolved issues and unanswered questions, when in 
reality these things are mostly obvious, were already explained or have no 
effect on the group whatsoever.

The fact that someone is not satisfied with an answer (which is already 
very clearly answered in the current and proposed bylaws) doesn't mean it's 
not clear enough. In this particular case, it is clear enough. And, in the 
end, it doesn't really matter what Michael's opinions on a secretary's role 
is, Paul is not voting if he wants Michael to be a secretary or not, he is 
voting on bylaw changes. The only things that matters is if the bylaw is 
clear enough, and this has not been questioned even once. The only thing I 
can see here is Paul making veiled accusations towards Michael (in the form 
of questions, of course, because one needs plausible deniability... he only 
*wants 
things to be clear) *in order to hijack this discussion*. *If you want my 
opinion, this is exactly what "acting in detriment of PHP-FIG's ability to 
meet its objectives" is.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP 
Framework Interoperability Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to php-fig+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to php-fig@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/php-fig/ed975371-878e-4d48-bde2-482c1e22eda1%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to