> On Sep 19, 2016, at 10:24, Matthew Weier O'Phinney <mweierophin...@gmail.com>
> On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Paul Jones <pmjone...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sep 15, 2016, at 13:37, Matthew Weier O'Phinney
>> <mweierophin...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> You're creating a false dichotomy, Paul.
>> Not at all. It might be part assistant, part something else (or perhaps
>> multiple something else
> And now you're moving the goalposts, because *before* you were asking if it
> one or the other.
Again, not at all. I pointed out the same possibility in my original
conversations with Michael (to which you were not privy, and since they were on
the record, I can publish them here if you like as proof). The goalposts are
just where they were when I started.
I continue to find it remarkable the amount of evasion going on here.
If the FIG secretarial role is something truly new-and-different, that cannot
be related to any other kind (or kinds) of secretary anywhere at any time ever,
then the title is poorly chosen.
On the other hand, if it *does* fit a particular kind(s) of secretary, then the
authors should say what it is.
At this point I don't expect the evasiveness to stop, but I will keep pointing
it out as it happens.
Paul M. Jones
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP
Framework Interoperability Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.