On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 01:26:39PM +0200, Alexander Burger wrote: > The difference may be that the logo and the picture in the +User object > have the "correct" file extension. In case of the logo it is ".png", and > for the user picture it is ".jpg". > > In case of the (embeddedable) blobs it it just ".d", to avoid any > assumption about the type of the blob. After all, it should be possible > to upload all kind of media in the future (currently only 'img' and > 'video' are expected, though). > > Could it be that the browser insists on a proper file name extension?
Hmm, now I tried here locally with 'firefox', 'w3m' and 'links2 -g'. While firefox displays the image, w3m and links2 don't. Only if I change the extension to '.jpg' instead of '.d', all browsers display the picture. Too bad! What's the correct way to handle this? Cheers, - Alex -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
