Alexander Burger <a...@software-lab.de> writes: Hi Alex,
>> Results are quite similar, but surprisingly enough, your 32bit system is >> faster on list manipulation than my 64bit system. > > I would have expected that. All other things equal, 64-bit PicoLisp is > usually slower than the 32-bit version, due to a poorer memory cache > performance (the cells are twice as large size). On the other hand, > arithmetics are faster, due to the additional short number type in > pil64. I added that comment to the wiki page, since the comparison between 32bit and 64bit was quite a nice side effect of Jose's replication of the test. Hope thats ok. -- cheers, Thorsten -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
