Just a lurker passing by: Personally I'm much less excited about things like pip or node.js packages. While I get their appeal often times you end up with quite a nonses like node.js left-pad issue of year or so ago. In my eyes it promotes a kinda of "shatered into milion pieces" situation. I'm much more keen on how things are in C land - go get stuff yourself :). Which somewhat prevents "dependacny creep".
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 09:02:57AM +0100, Jakob Eriksson wrote: > And I would be interested in working on a package or module system similar to > "pip" for Python. > > I must confess that most discussions about namespaces etc on this list is way > over my head... however could I be on the right track if I were to assume > that using "local" in such modules would be a good start, so as to only > export deliberately exposed symbols from a package? > > > > > > 24 feb. 2017 kl. 08:45 skrev Alexander Burger <a...@software-lab.de>: > > > > Hi Erik, > > > > thanks for the long post! > > > > Just in short: > > > >> 'Learn PicoLisp the Hard Way' > > > > I totally agree. This would be a great project, I'm ready to join. > > Same for Stack Overflow support. > > > > > >> And let's make sure said landing page is served over HTTPS. It's 2017. > > > > Yes, yes, I know ;) In fact, it is on my todo list since half a year. > > > > I want to use Let's Encrypt, as I already do on another server. However, the > > picolisp.com server is currently a mix of Wheezy, Jessie and Stretch, and > > whatever I tried to get the certbot running resulted in a storm of Python > > package mismatch error messages. No way .. I gave up, and decided to wait > > until > > Debian Stretch is stable and thus available from my provider. > > > > ♪♫ Alex > > -- > > UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe > > -- > UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
