Interesting. But I am confused, which of you is correct? :)
| Bill Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
07/25/2002 01:54 PM
|
To: Plucker Development List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject: Re: Pocket PC Question |
Wow, I've had this conversation before on other lists!
I meant compatible in terms of APIs, which can be invariant
across architectures. A quick re-compile and we're home.
Bill
> On Wed, 24 Jul 2002, Bill Janssen wrote:
>
> > Bill Nalen writes:
> > ... I don't know how close Pocket PC is to Win32, though....
>
> I can't imagine it being very close on a machine level - the PocketPCs
> use ARM and X-Scale processor chips instead of X86 chips, and I
> can't see the underlying hardware being very similar.... Maybe I don't
> understand what you're talking about, but I can't
> imagine that the desktop libraries very cross-compatable.
>
> IANAP, though. YMMV, Etc. :)
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
