-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> I can't imagine it being very close on a machine level - the PocketPCs use
> ARM and X-Scale processor chips instead of X86 chips, and I can't see the
> underlying hardware being very similar.
Nor should the person who ports it to PocketPC care.. if the
PocketPC development team did their job right, you shouldn't have to worry
about the underlying chipset or architecture (and in fact, it should be
required not to do so, since PocketPC runs on mips, ARM, Motorola, etc.
chipsets). Ideally there's a usable layer of abstraction in the toolkit so
that you don't have to rely on poking at hardware.
d.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9P20zkRQERnB1rkoRAkkDAKCSH3r0RBM9qmPdeEQjabImQspegQCg1N54
IY7mVwc6Sb6tldBWtJL5G34=
=h1lH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
