Wow, I've had this conversation before on other lists! I meant compatible in terms of APIs, which can be invariant across architectures. A quick re-compile and we're home.
Bill > On Wed, 24 Jul 2002, Bill Janssen wrote: > > > Bill Nalen writes: > > ... I don't know how close Pocket PC is to Win32, though.... > > I can't imagine it being very close on a machine level - the PocketPCs > use ARM and X-Scale processor chips instead of X86 chips, and I > can't see the underlying hardware being very similar.... Maybe I don't > understand what you're talking about, but I can't > imagine that the desktop libraries very cross-compatable. > > IANAP, though. YMMV, Etc. :) > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
