On 9/16/06, Dean Michael Berris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I actually believe in Open Source Software (I write open source software too) -- but stay away from infectious licenses like the GPL (I just don't need the dogma). I like the idea of being able to use software as it is _even to make profit out of selling or supporting_ it.
Are you saying that its much better not to adopt a free software license (not just GPL but GPL compatible as well), and instead focus on alleged "business-friendly" "open source" licenses? If that's the case (we're going technical here), you can't use the FreeBSD, Modified BSD, and even the Boost Software License ;) But then you don't have to declare it sa such, like I said its just being technical and nothing philosopical here is considered. we could always create a new license anyway, that is fit for the local requirements. -- Jerome Gotangco Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 0x9E379FC6 _________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
