On 27/11/02 3:33, "Jay Busse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>> Another big advantage (for me) of CMOS is the lack of a dust problem on
>> the sensor which can become a real pain.
> 
> I wasn't aware of this advantage to CMOS. How/why does this work?

In simple terms. Because that's the way I understand it :-)

The CCD has a charge on it. When you remove a lens on the camera, the CCD
sucks in all the dust it can from the atmosphere, attracted by the charge.
This leads to dust spots on the sensor and the need to clean the sensor.

CMOS does not have this charge, when you remove a lens, a dust speck may
fall onto the sensor, but will not be sucked in forcibly. Hence dust specks
appear to be a very rare occurrence on a CMOS camera. I have never once had
to clean the sensor of a D30/D60 in two years.

I'm sure there is a more technical explanation out there, but this is a good
summary. Check out all the review sites etc. (as I did for over a year) and
you will see that most people with a CCD camera, have to clean the sensor at
some time or other. CMOS people do not. (Yes this is a generalisation, I'm
sure somebody has cleaned a CMOS sensor at some time!)

Paul
-- 
Paul Tansley
Fashion & Beauty Photography
London
+44 (0) 7973 669584
http://www.paultansley.com

===============================================================
GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE

Reply via email to