It was 23/8/04 8:58 pm, when Jorge Parra wrote: > My questioning about this is the archival , long term storage quality of > jpegs, but agree that for transmission, it is the ideal format.
Jorge JPEG 2000?...It's still a JPEG - contrary to rumours that it's a TIFF - compressed but lossless. TIFFs and JPEGs do not support the same features and, therefore, cannot possibly be thought of as the same file format. BTW, piping isn't the format's only advantage. You can cram a LOT more CMYK JPEGs on a CD/DVD than you can TIFFs. Take a CMYK TIFF and convert it to a full quality JPEG and see the difference in file size for yourself. Kind regards, Shangara Singh. :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :: Stills Photographer :: Photoshop CS Adobe Certified Expert :: http://www.aspect-photography.co.uk =============================================================== GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
