On 23/8/04 5:38 PM, Shangara Singh wrote > JPEG 2000?...It's still a JPEG - contrary to rumours that it's a TIFF - > compressed but lossless.
Shangara Yes it is , and the interfase to produce them is clunky and sloooooww to say the least. Jepg 200 is still a panacea , although the lossless concept is a very good one. Now we need processing plugins or embedded algorithms to run properly and fast in a standardised workflow. Just try to convert some 50 tiff files ( or jpegs) into Jpeg 2K and we talk later. Best. Jorge Parra =============================================================== GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
