On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Ken Dibble <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> > There is also the possibility that the website host provider is suddenly
>> > blocking requests from us, or some server in our ISP's chain. So we have
>> > a
>> > ticket in with the website's host. (We have a contractual relationship
>> > with
>> > the website owner that requires us to use it to upload data.)
>>
>> Good. Serious network diagnostic tools should help resolve these
>> problems. Right now, we're really at the "turn it off and back on"
>> stage.
>
>
> Website host service reports that our IP is being blocked because we are
> exceeding the server's concurrent connection limit. They say the server
> reported 208 concurrent connections from our IP address at some point
> yesterday afternoon. They temporarily released the block but it has recurred
> a couple of times since then.
>
> They haven't said what the limit is, but they are, IMO, imposing an
> unrealistically low concurrent connection limit on a public website. There
> are well over 100 people using our internet connection and many of them may
> have an interest in visiting this website since it has general applicability
> to much of the work we do here. I think what they really want to do is to
> impose a limit on the number of people who can simultaneously access the
> private, task specific, data services hosted on their domain.
>
> That being said, it does seem unlikely that in the ordinary course of
> business we would have over 200 people connecting to their site. It may or
> may not depend on definition of "connection": are there not some
> circumstances under which software enhances the total bandwidth of an
> instance of communication between two internet nodes by means of multiple
> connections?
>
> Our anti-malware system is not reporting any unsual traffic, and it has so
> far been very good at catching things that generate such traffic.
>
> Can anyone suggest possible causes for this?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Ken Dibble
> www.stic-cil.org
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cacw6n4vdowgd0_wsrfgujwkrufd51gkqe3fngbzkogjccsl...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to