> > What you do in private can also reflect on the company. If you want
> > to mash
> > your brains then as said thats up to you. But I would never employ
> > a drug
> > user. At least heavy drugs. As for fire me if I suck, its a bit
> > late if you
> > invest in training be it expense or time.
>
>         So if an employee wanted to join an evangelical church, and you
>considered that a poor reflection on your company, you could fire
>them, even if they confined their religious activities to their
>private time? What if they played in a rock band, and you didn't like
>their music? Or what if they went to a protest rally on a weekend,
>and you didn't support the cause?

Many years ago, my dad was a young man working for a very large US 
corporation. There was a debate in the local school district over whether 
the school should have a swimming pool. My dad, very conservative, was 
opposed to it and began publicly organizing people against it. His boss, 
who was for the pool, got wind of it and told him to knock it off or he'd 
lose his job. My dad, apparently, caved.

I bet that kind of thing has been going on all the time, for decades.

My dad is also anti-union--but a union could and would have prevented that 
scenario.

Employers have the ability to pull all kinds of garbage. Employees, though 
they may complain about it on the Internet, have, in comparison, very 
little ability to prevent them from doing it--unless they organize.

Ken Dibble
www.stic-cil.org



_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to