I doubt they have any kind of a trial version.   I figured the price of a
new plotter was much greater than getting a driver for it.  It's not like
many people are going to buy this package, so they charge accordingly.   I'm
not a big XP fan, but I did do a quick search and it appears that it is
supported.  You can always post a question to their technical support.

> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the tip about Winline.  I really need to use the plotter with
WinXP.
>
> I wonder if Winline has a trial version?
>
> They want $200.00 for their driver which is too steep just for a driver.
>
> Thanks
>
> Ros
>
>



----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian Guralnick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 10:38 PM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Nvidia graphics card users


> My mistake, it's the NEC Multisync FE750+, at 337$ CDN.
> http://www.nmvap.com.sg/product/nec/msfeplus/msfe750pls.htm
>
> As far as displays go, I will go flat screen once the OLED panels become
available.
> For 337$ & it's clarity at 1600x1200, the Nec FE750+ is still a real great
buy.  I
> personally still use all of my Mitsubishi Diamond Pro 2020u.  At 1100$
CDN, I have
> yet to see a better 2048x1536 22 inch screen which is flat as a table top
with text
> as crisp as LCD screens.
>
> ____________
> Brian Guralnick
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
> -------------------
> Comedy clips:
> ftp://ftp.point-lab.com/quartus/Public/MP3/Simpsons-FatFingers.mp3  -53K
>
tp://ftp.point-lab.com/quartus/Public/MP3/Simpsons-Moe-LieDetector.mp3  -166
K
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
> -------------------
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tony Karavidas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 9:50 PM
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] Nvidia graphics card users
>
>
> |
> | Isn't the NEC 4FG a  15" tube? Do you have a link to show me what you're
> | talking about?
> |
> | Have you ever seen the monitor properly connected?
> |
> | I'll never go back to tubes. Not after seeing bright, razor sharp text.
No
> | more focusissues, convergence issues, pincushioning, etc...
> |
> | Tony
> |
> |
> |
> |
> | > -----Original Message-----
> | > From: Brian Guralnick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> | > Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 6:15 PM
> | > To: Protel EDA Forum
> | > Subject: Re: [PEDA] Nvidia graphics card users
> | >
> | >
> | > What a piece of junk.  Get the Nec Multisync 4FG 17 inch natural
> | > flat + super bright
> | > for 475$ CDN.
> | > ____________
> | > Brian Guralnick
> | > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> | > -------------------
> | > -------------------
> | > Comedy clips:
> | >
tp://ftp.point-lab.com/quartus/Public/MP3/Simpsons-FatFingers.mp3  -53K
> | > ftp://ftp.point-lab.com/quartus/Public/MP3/Simpsons-Moe-LieDetecto
> | > r.mp3  -166K
> | > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> | > -------------------
> | > -------------------
> | >
> | >
> | > ----- Original Message -----
> | > From: "Tony Karavidas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> | > To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> | > Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 7:48 PM
> | > Subject: Re: [PEDA] Nvidia graphics card users
> | >
> | >
> | > | Oh, and I forgot to say Costco has the Sylvania 17" LCD
> | > monitors for $500
> | > | now. I have them on my Mac and Win2000 machine.
> | > |
> | > | Go buy a pair..tell you boss..do what you can.
> | > |
> | > | Tony
> | > |
> | > | > -----Original Message-----
> | > | > From: Andrew Jenkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> | > | > Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 4:24 PM
> | > | > To: Protel EDA Forum
> | > | > Subject: Re: [PEDA] Nvidia graphics card users
> | > | >
> | > | >
> | > | > On 07:05 PM 2/15/2002 -0500, Andrew Jenkins wrote:
> | > | > >On 11:58 AM 2/15/2002 -0800, Tony Karavidas wrote:
> | > | > >
> | > | > > >Matt Pobursky wrote:
> | > | > > >>I'm wondering if Nvidia has cracked the Win2K dual
monitor/dual
> | > | > > >>resolution thing or if it just works with Win9x/WinXP (like
> | > | > > >>everyone else but Matrox). I've got a Geforce2 GTS card with
dual
> | > | > > >>head outputs I'd love to use with Win2K and dual monitors.
> | > | > > >As I understand it, it's only the Geforce 4 cards, and the MX
> | > | > based cards.
> | > | > > >I'm not sure if the Geforce2 GTS is included. I may be wrong.
> | > | > However, the
> | > | > > >card I have is roughly $60 now. Dirt cheap.
> | > | > >
> | > | > >
> | > | > >Any and all Nvidia Twinview capable boards are supported, under
> | > | > Win9x, 98, 2000, and XP. This includes the original MX (my card,
> | > | > not an MX2 as I originally reported), MX2, MX200, MX400, and any
> | > | > other flavor which has dual output capability and uses an NVidia
> | > | > GEForce chipset.
> | > | >
> | > | > Oops, forgot to mention Win ME and NT4, both of which are
> | > also supported.
> | > | >
> | > | > I would like to note one thing that users should take into
> | > | > consideration before enabling dual-resolution. For those of you
> | > | > with older cards (such as original MX users like myself), you
> | > | > will find that bandwidth limitations of the hardware itself will
> | > | > limit some capabilities, once dual-resolution is enabled. I
> | > | > believe that it's because when the heads are treated as
> | > | > independent devices, the secondary head hasn't enough "kick" left
> | > | > to perform as well as it does when it is simply an extension of
> | > | > the primary driver.
> | > | >
> | > | > I'd be interested to hear from those of you with newer cards to
> | > | > verify my suspicions, if you have a TV card or the like, which on
> | > | > my system no longer (only when dual-res is enabled) will operate
> | > | > at full 30fps on the secondary monitor (works just fine if I run
> | > | > in with single resolution). If you have an MX400 or other, newer
> | > | > NVidia Twinview card and have installed the 27.2 (or above)
> | > | > driver, and you're running a TV card or similar on the system,
> | > | > please let me know if you experience the same problem, or whether
> | > | > it "goes away" with the faster card...As I noted in an earlier
> | > | > post, I'm completing the specification of a new workstation for a
> | > | > client, and with the emrgence of NView, I think that I'd prefer
> | > | > to stick with an NVidia card, but I'm not sure whether my
> | > | > assumption regarding secondary monitor/"device" performance is
> | > | > valid or simply wishful thinking...
> | > | >
> | > | > aj
> | > |
> | > |
> | > |
> | >
> |
> |


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Reply via email to