Isn't the NEC 4FG a  15" tube? Do you have a link to show me what you're
talking about?

Have you ever seen the monitor properly connected?

I'll never go back to tubes. Not after seeing bright, razor sharp text. No
more focusissues, convergence issues, pincushioning, etc...

Tony




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian Guralnick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 6:15 PM
> To: Protel EDA Forum
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] Nvidia graphics card users
>
>
> What a piece of junk.  Get the Nec Multisync 4FG 17 inch natural
> flat + super bright
> for 475$ CDN.
> ____________
> Brian Guralnick
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------------
> -------------------
> Comedy clips:
> ftp://ftp.point-lab.com/quartus/Public/MP3/Simpsons-FatFingers.mp3  -53K
> ftp://ftp.point-lab.com/quartus/Public/MP3/Simpsons-Moe-LieDetecto
> r.mp3  -166K
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------------
> -------------------
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tony Karavidas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 7:48 PM
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] Nvidia graphics card users
>
>
> | Oh, and I forgot to say Costco has the Sylvania 17" LCD
> monitors for $500
> | now. I have them on my Mac and Win2000 machine.
> |
> | Go buy a pair..tell you boss..do what you can.
> |
> | Tony
> |
> | > -----Original Message-----
> | > From: Andrew Jenkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> | > Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 4:24 PM
> | > To: Protel EDA Forum
> | > Subject: Re: [PEDA] Nvidia graphics card users
> | >
> | >
> | > On 07:05 PM 2/15/2002 -0500, Andrew Jenkins wrote:
> | > >On 11:58 AM 2/15/2002 -0800, Tony Karavidas wrote:
> | > >
> | > > >Matt Pobursky wrote:
> | > > >>I'm wondering if Nvidia has cracked the Win2K dual monitor/dual
> | > > >>resolution thing or if it just works with Win9x/WinXP (like
> | > > >>everyone else but Matrox). I've got a Geforce2 GTS card with dual
> | > > >>head outputs I'd love to use with Win2K and dual monitors.
> | > > >As I understand it, it's only the Geforce 4 cards, and the MX
> | > based cards.
> | > > >I'm not sure if the Geforce2 GTS is included. I may be wrong.
> | > However, the
> | > > >card I have is roughly $60 now. Dirt cheap.
> | > >
> | > >
> | > >Any and all Nvidia Twinview capable boards are supported, under
> | > Win9x, 98, 2000, and XP. This includes the original MX (my card,
> | > not an MX2 as I originally reported), MX2, MX200, MX400, and any
> | > other flavor which has dual output capability and uses an NVidia
> | > GEForce chipset.
> | >
> | > Oops, forgot to mention Win ME and NT4, both of which are
> also supported.
> | >
> | > I would like to note one thing that users should take into
> | > consideration before enabling dual-resolution. For those of you
> | > with older cards (such as original MX users like myself), you
> | > will find that bandwidth limitations of the hardware itself will
> | > limit some capabilities, once dual-resolution is enabled. I
> | > believe that it's because when the heads are treated as
> | > independent devices, the secondary head hasn't enough "kick" left
> | > to perform as well as it does when it is simply an extension of
> | > the primary driver.
> | >
> | > I'd be interested to hear from those of you with newer cards to
> | > verify my suspicions, if you have a TV card or the like, which on
> | > my system no longer (only when dual-res is enabled) will operate
> | > at full 30fps on the secondary monitor (works just fine if I run
> | > in with single resolution). If you have an MX400 or other, newer
> | > NVidia Twinview card and have installed the 27.2 (or above)
> | > driver, and you're running a TV card or similar on the system,
> | > please let me know if you experience the same problem, or whether
> | > it "goes away" with the faster card...As I noted in an earlier
> | > post, I'm completing the specification of a new workstation for a
> | > client, and with the emrgence of NView, I think that I'd prefer
> | > to stick with an NVidia card, but I'm not sure whether my
> | > assumption regarding secondary monitor/"device" performance is
> | > valid or simply wishful thinking...
> | >
> | > aj
> |
> |
> |
>

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Reply via email to