My mistake, it's the NEC Multisync FE750+, at 337$ CDN. http://www.nmvap.com.sg/product/nec/msfeplus/msfe750pls.htm
As far as displays go, I will go flat screen once the OLED panels become available. For 337$ & it's clarity at 1600x1200, the Nec FE750+ is still a real great buy. I personally still use all of my Mitsubishi Diamond Pro 2020u. At 1100$ CDN, I have yet to see a better 2048x1536 22 inch screen which is flat as a table top with text as crisp as LCD screens. ____________ Brian Guralnick ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------- Comedy clips: ftp://ftp.point-lab.com/quartus/Public/MP3/Simpsons-FatFingers.mp3 -53K ftp://ftp.point-lab.com/quartus/Public/MP3/Simpsons-Moe-LieDetector.mp3 -166K ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tony Karavidas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 9:50 PM Subject: Re: [PEDA] Nvidia graphics card users | | Isn't the NEC 4FG a 15" tube? Do you have a link to show me what you're | talking about? | | Have you ever seen the monitor properly connected? | | I'll never go back to tubes. Not after seeing bright, razor sharp text. No | more focusissues, convergence issues, pincushioning, etc... | | Tony | | | | | > -----Original Message----- | > From: Brian Guralnick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] | > Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 6:15 PM | > To: Protel EDA Forum | > Subject: Re: [PEDA] Nvidia graphics card users | > | > | > What a piece of junk. Get the Nec Multisync 4FG 17 inch natural | > flat + super bright | > for 475$ CDN. | > ____________ | > Brian Guralnick | > ------------------------------------------------------------------ | > ------------------- | > ------------------- | > Comedy clips: | > ftp://ftp.point-lab.com/quartus/Public/MP3/Simpsons-FatFingers.mp3 -53K | > ftp://ftp.point-lab.com/quartus/Public/MP3/Simpsons-Moe-LieDetecto | > r.mp3 -166K | > ------------------------------------------------------------------ | > ------------------- | > ------------------- | > | > | > ----- Original Message ----- | > From: "Tony Karavidas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | > To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | > Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 7:48 PM | > Subject: Re: [PEDA] Nvidia graphics card users | > | > | > | Oh, and I forgot to say Costco has the Sylvania 17" LCD | > monitors for $500 | > | now. I have them on my Mac and Win2000 machine. | > | | > | Go buy a pair..tell you boss..do what you can. | > | | > | Tony | > | | > | > -----Original Message----- | > | > From: Andrew Jenkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] | > | > Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 4:24 PM | > | > To: Protel EDA Forum | > | > Subject: Re: [PEDA] Nvidia graphics card users | > | > | > | > | > | > On 07:05 PM 2/15/2002 -0500, Andrew Jenkins wrote: | > | > >On 11:58 AM 2/15/2002 -0800, Tony Karavidas wrote: | > | > > | > | > > >Matt Pobursky wrote: | > | > > >>I'm wondering if Nvidia has cracked the Win2K dual monitor/dual | > | > > >>resolution thing or if it just works with Win9x/WinXP (like | > | > > >>everyone else but Matrox). I've got a Geforce2 GTS card with dual | > | > > >>head outputs I'd love to use with Win2K and dual monitors. | > | > > >As I understand it, it's only the Geforce 4 cards, and the MX | > | > based cards. | > | > > >I'm not sure if the Geforce2 GTS is included. I may be wrong. | > | > However, the | > | > > >card I have is roughly $60 now. Dirt cheap. | > | > > | > | > > | > | > >Any and all Nvidia Twinview capable boards are supported, under | > | > Win9x, 98, 2000, and XP. This includes the original MX (my card, | > | > not an MX2 as I originally reported), MX2, MX200, MX400, and any | > | > other flavor which has dual output capability and uses an NVidia | > | > GEForce chipset. | > | > | > | > Oops, forgot to mention Win ME and NT4, both of which are | > also supported. | > | > | > | > I would like to note one thing that users should take into | > | > consideration before enabling dual-resolution. For those of you | > | > with older cards (such as original MX users like myself), you | > | > will find that bandwidth limitations of the hardware itself will | > | > limit some capabilities, once dual-resolution is enabled. I | > | > believe that it's because when the heads are treated as | > | > independent devices, the secondary head hasn't enough "kick" left | > | > to perform as well as it does when it is simply an extension of | > | > the primary driver. | > | > | > | > I'd be interested to hear from those of you with newer cards to | > | > verify my suspicions, if you have a TV card or the like, which on | > | > my system no longer (only when dual-res is enabled) will operate | > | > at full 30fps on the secondary monitor (works just fine if I run | > | > in with single resolution). If you have an MX400 or other, newer | > | > NVidia Twinview card and have installed the 27.2 (or above) | > | > driver, and you're running a TV card or similar on the system, | > | > please let me know if you experience the same problem, or whether | > | > it "goes away" with the faster card...As I noted in an earlier | > | > post, I'm completing the specification of a new workstation for a | > | > client, and with the emrgence of NView, I think that I'd prefer | > | > to stick with an NVidia card, but I'm not sure whether my | > | > assumption regarding secondary monitor/"device" performance is | > | > valid or simply wishful thinking... | > | > | > | > aj | > | | > | | > | | > | | * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To leave this list visit: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html * * Contact the list manager: * mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * Forum Guidelines Rules: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html * * Browse or Search previous postings: * http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
