well, there were lots of these documents added , but the problem was it was
all on _microfilms_ . Part numbering system, revisions, flowcharts,
principles of operation , lots of stuff on tens and hundreds of archived
mcrofilms. This was in a previous life while working for  Control Data
Corporation, PC's weren't invented yet.

Matt Tudor , MSEE
http://www.gigahertzelectronics.com


----- Original Message -----
From: "Ian Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 8:08 PM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] SPICE sim question


> On 12:02 PM 2/07/2002 -0400, mariusrf said:
> >I still have memories of some analog switching done with bipolars , only
> >using reverse saturation (collector reversed with emmitter - picture a
npn
> >with the emmitter tied at a more positive potential than the collector) .
> >The trick was yielding lower Uce in saturation. Lots of people were quick
to
> >point out that the schematic had an error ;)
> >
> >Best Regards,
> >Matt Tudor , MSEE
> >http://www.gigahertzelectronics.com
>
>
> Of course a well documented design would have recognised that many people
> would detect this as a possible error and so have an annotation on the Sch
> to inform the reader that the reverse C-E connection was deliberate and
> refer to the supporting documentation for further info.  I am sure that
> this was added to the final release Sch, wasn't it :-)
>
> Ian Wilson
>
>
> ************************************************************************
> * Tracking #: 61DAD9D5164115428CA95267469DA2DF5D64EC29
> *
> ************************************************************************

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Reply via email to