On 12:02 PM 2/07/2002 -0400, mariusrf said: >I still have memories of some analog switching done with bipolars , only >using reverse saturation (collector reversed with emmitter - picture a npn >with the emmitter tied at a more positive potential than the collector) . >The trick was yielding lower Uce in saturation. Lots of people were quick to >point out that the schematic had an error ;) > >Best Regards, >Matt Tudor , MSEE >http://www.gigahertzelectronics.com
Of course a well documented design would have recognised that many people would detect this as a possible error and so have an annotation on the Sch to inform the reader that the reverse C-E connection was deliberate and refer to the supporting documentation for further info. I am sure that this was added to the final release Sch, wasn't it :-) Ian Wilson ************************************************************************ * Tracking #: 61DAD9D5164115428CA95267469DA2DF5D64EC29 * ************************************************************************ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To leave this list visit: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html * * Contact the list manager: * mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * Forum Guidelines Rules: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html * * Browse or Search previous postings: * http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
