On 12:02 PM 2/07/2002 -0400, mariusrf said:
>I still have memories of some analog switching done with bipolars , only
>using reverse saturation (collector reversed with emmitter - picture a npn
>with the emmitter tied at a more positive potential than the collector) .
>The trick was yielding lower Uce in saturation. Lots of people were quick to
>point out that the schematic had an error ;)
>
>Best Regards,
>Matt Tudor , MSEE
>http://www.gigahertzelectronics.com


Of course a well documented design would have recognised that many people 
would detect this as a possible error and so have an annotation on the Sch 
to inform the reader that the reverse C-E connection was deliberate and 
refer to the supporting documentation for further info.  I am sure that 
this was added to the final release Sch, wasn't it :-)

Ian Wilson


************************************************************************
* Tracking #: 61DAD9D5164115428CA95267469DA2DF5D64EC29
*
************************************************************************

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Reply via email to