Thanks for the compliments, guys. Alex Russell's post on the subject (http://blog.dojotoolkit.org/ 2007/02/04/dojoquery-a-css-query-engine-for-dojo) has stirred some diplomatic talks. It looks like Alex, John Resig, Jack Slocum, Dean Edwards, and I are going to pitch in toward some sort of site where all the different CSS-querying implementations can be benchmarked against uniform, real-world examples. I think this is a great idea and can only make all our engines better.
I don't think this project has any sort of timetable, though, so when I have a moment I'll clean up what I've got so far and submit a patch so we can start discussing this. And once Sam opens up branches I think it'll be much easier to collaborate on this code. ATTENTION TO ANYONE WHO READS THIS LIST: If you're an XPath rockstar, I need to talk to you. Cheers, Andrew On Feb 5, 12:35 am, Christophe Porteneuve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I certainly concur with Mislav. I've been looking at your code twice, > and it looks pretty good to me. I especially like the feature > modularity thing. > > Yes, it weights twice as much as the current selector implementation, > but then, its way faster, much more modular, and compressed JS is there > for us anyhow. > > Submit the patch, and tickle Sam until he works with it :-) > > -- > Christophe Porteneuve a.k.a. TDD > "[They] did not know it was impossible, so they did it." --Mark Twain > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to email@example.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---