On Feb 16, 8:43 am, Christophe Porteneuve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is great, but you would need to provide unit tests for the extra > features...
Yeah, working on that. I posted the patch in the airport in Tel Aviv right before boarding a plane, and unit tests slipped my mind at the time. > My opinion is pretty slicing clear: > > - pseudo-elements are not going to be detectable in a portable manner > (at least, too few of them), and are of little interest anyway. > - pseudo-*classes* are very much detectable, and will: I'm working on it > these days, specifically for this $$ rewrite. You mean this the other way around, right? Pseudo-classes (hover, active, etc.) are the ones that don't seem useful to me (they select elements in certain states, which is nearly meaningless in a DOM scripting context). Cheers, Andrew --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
