--- In [email protected], Darryl Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> I've done Quackle simming on the opening move in several games, and
> Quackle has whizzed through 1000-2000 iterations very quickly, even
> when its top choices were not intuitively "obvious". Good results,
> nifty speed!
>
> On the opening move in other games, where the first move is an
obvious
> no-brainer (eg from an opening rack of AAENOQU, play QUENA from
8D),
> Quackle seems to take forever to do 50 or so iterations, and even
then
> the no-brainer move hasn't risen to the top of the list as the best
> move. Poor result, snail-like speed!
>
> Why the disparity?
I believe that Darryl, like Ed and me, uses Windows XP. I just don't
understand why we get such different experiences with Maven and
Quackle. Neither Quackle nor Maven could be described as "whizzing"
at any time for me. Can anyone answer that question? And my previous
one about why XP is so much worse than ME was?
Pete
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/quackle/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
