> > RFB is a wonderful idea. Aside from the main site, there is a lot of catching-up to do (quantity-wise anyway) compared to something like JavaScript or Ruby.
> I'm not sure if HN even matters if there are enough good blog posts out there. Search does a decent job of getting people to those sorts of post. > Biggest obstacles I see to filling the web with Racket articles would be the high quality of existing documentation, and the straight-forward nature of the language itself. When it comes to things like C++, PHP, and JavaScript, there is so much room for comment because they are all so full of arbitrary / strange / questionable choices that demand further explanation, and once explained, open the field to debate over which (necessary) defensive strategies are best. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
