On 12/24/09 11:48 AM, Peter Degen-Portnoy wrote:
> Excellent perspective, Sean, thank you. I'll check into our numbers; and
> the 300ms is a very helpful data point.
> Also, thanks for the references to volume. Could you please clarify CACM?
> Is that cacm.acm.org or cacm.org, please? Or something else entirely?
The former. Both of those sites are by Digital Pulp (Josh & friends),
Radiant mailing list