On 12/24/09 11:48 AM, Peter Degen-Portnoy wrote:
> Excellent perspective, Sean, thank you.  I'll check into our numbers; and
> the 300ms is a very helpful data point.
> Also, thanks for the references to volume.  Could you please clarify CACM?
> Is that cacm.acm.org or cacm.org, please?  Or something else entirely?
The former.  Both of those sites are by Digital Pulp (Josh & friends), 

Radiant mailing list
Post:   Radiant@radiantcms.org
Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/
Site:   http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant

Reply via email to