If the Sackville is large enough to carry your stuff, it's a good
choice.  The F-15 will take up some handlebar space.  The main
question is whether that set-up will handle the wieght and volume you
carry.

My Acorn Boxy rando sits on the little front rack, no decalleur.  I
too like a quick off'n'on, so I added a pair of D-rings to the bottom
near the front and a bit of shock cord with an S-hook.  It seems
secure enough between the rear strap that drops over the rack and the
single cord in the front.  I don't bother with the 4 velcro straps.  I
tend to stuff it full of food, camera, etc, then cram a jacket on top
to the point of bulging the top.  Stability seems OK.

dougP

On Sep 4, 1:10 pm, Shifty <[email protected]> wrote:
> My heart now beats a little faster when considering what I now know to be
> called, front mount bags and handlebar bags, thanks to all the positive
> reviews. It's a much spendier proposition than I first realized, however.
> The front mounts not only require a $120ish front rack but a $85ish
> decalleur. That means the two bags I'm particularly enamored with, the Acorn
> Boxy Rando Bag and the Berthoud GB25, seemingly attainable bags at $175 and
> $255 respectively, actually cost around $380 and $460!!!
>
> As a result, I'm heavily considering Riv's Sackville Barsack and Nitto F-15
> mount for a grand total of $225. I like the idea of quickily taking the back
> with me when I lock it outside while I refuel on caffeine and scones. It
> also appears quick and easy to remove the rack for quicker, tube+pump
> fitness rides.
>
> Any critiques of this set-up are welcome. I

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

Reply via email to