----- Carlos M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On the thread "How much of RB2006 is now written in RB itself?" > Charles Yeomans wrote (Jul 15, 2006 1:32 AM): > > I do wish that RS would take one of its rapid release > > periods and devote it to optimization and bug fixes.
Thats every release, if you look at the release notes, you will find lots of bug fixes and optimizations every release. > > I also agree with this and I wish a little more ;) > > I think RS must pay big attention to the following: > New features do not have any value to customers (mainly to current) > if > they cannot use a new release due to important bugs that were not > fixed or are new! Some of these new features you guys are so scared of, have also made it possible for me to release software. > > Based on this I created a new feedback report to give suggestions to > RS to fix most bugs. > Report id: wmqizprq > http://snipurl.com/fixbugs > > Basically my suggestion is to change the Rapid Release Model to the > following: > - Releases 1 and 3: Dedicated to new features and bug fixes; > - Releases 2 and 4: Dedicated ONLY to bug fixes and optimization (no > new features). I like the current model, of bug fixes and features with each release. > > This would allow RS to concentrate at least two times per year to > ONLY > fix bugs and improve optimization. RS should fix also bugs with one > or > few 'votes'. I don't think RS blindly follows the votes, I have had several of my bug fixes with 1 vote fixed. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
