Sandy's right - Karen is being needlessly provocative. And Trudy is right,
she has the guy convicted without the benefit of a trial. Nonetheless,
there are some procedural niceties to consider here - if John Howard were
accused of rape, I'd sure as hell expect him to stand aside until the trial.
Consistency compels me to think Clarke should too. Dontchareckon?
Tim
==================
-----Original Message-----
From: Trudy & Rod Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, August 03, 2000 12:54 AM
Subject: Re: [recoznet2] Re: The Canberra Times: Burke calls on ATSIC chair
to stand down while ...
>Have you convicted him already? What happened to innocent until PROVEN
>guilty? Burke, Howard and Court have condemned themselves.
>
>Trudy
>
------------------------------------------------------
RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived at
http://www.mail-archive.com/
To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the body
of the message, include the words: unsubscribe announce or click here
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without permission
from the
copyright owner for purposes of criticism, comment, scholarship and research under
the "fair
use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed further
without
permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."
RecOzNet2 is archived for members @
http://www.mail-archive.com/recoznet2%40paradigm4.com.au/
