I will add only anecdotally, that I've taken a customer from 3.1 up to
3.3.2 with repoze and the repoze piece has posed no issues.  It's a
little clunky, but it works.  I look forward to WSGI integrated into
the core Zope/Plone stack.


On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Hanno Schlichting <ha...@hannosch.eu> wrote:
> Hi.
> I'm not a representative of the Repoze project, so I'll just share my
> personal view.
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 9:23 PM, ken manheimer <ken.manhei...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
>> these seem to be likely questions if you're interested in adoption of
>> repoze.plone by the wider plone community.  please let me know if i'm
>> misunderstanding something basic, or if i've missed somewhere that covers
>> the issues...
> repoze.zope2 and .plone have been written largely by Agendaless for
> the KARL project. That project has gone through another iteration and
> nowadays uses repoze.bfg without any Plone instead. While there are
> some individual users of the repoze.plone approach, there's currently
> no driving party behind it anymore.
> Now it's perfectly possible to use most of the software with
> up-to-date versions of Zope2 and Plone, but this setup isn't
> particular well documented or explained anywhere. The entire stack is
> however production proven and there's no doubt about its quality.
> At this point I see repoze.zope2 / .plone as a prototype for a full
> WSGI integration into Zope2. It's likely not going to see major
> adoption in its current form. It's more likely that the lessons
> learned from this project will be merged back in some form into Zope2
> itself, providing it with an OOTB WSGI story. If everything goes well,
> I hope to see Plone have official WSGI support in the future. The
> timeline for that is probably Zope 2.13 or later and Plone 5.0 with a
> final release somewhere in 2011 or 2012. With such a long timeframe
> there's obviously lots of unknowns.
> In this situation it's up to every user to decide if the benefits of
> the WSGI approach outweigh the costs of going with a non-standard
> approach. As always you can make a difference by getting involved and
> driving this project forward yourself ;-)
> Hanno
> _______________________________________________
> Repoze-dev mailing list
> Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org
> http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev
Repoze-dev mailing list

Reply via email to