> I'd like to say that I am not knocking Retrospect in the very least.
> This discussion on compression started by a feature suggestion.
> Retrospect is the best backup software on the market.  I say that
> without hesitation because our department has tried at least 2 others
> and they quite frankly suck in comparison.
> My suggestion was _not_ to add software compression and get rid of no
> compression, 2:1, or hardware compression options.
> My suggestion was to add a feature that allowed greater compression
> at the cost of speed, but allow people to have a choice.

Thanks for the kind words!

I should have also said in my previous reply: this is a good idea. Thanks!
It could work particularly well for non-tape or slow destinations.


To subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:        <http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/>

For urgent issues, please contact Dantz technical support directly at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or 925.253.3050.

Reply via email to