Hi, I tried to move from a svn based install to the latest install and unfortunately failed when easy_install tried to install the dependency of PIL. I have [EMAIL PROTECTED] also an rpm for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The error is below. Anything obvious to any python people (of which I am not)? Cheers, -Lyndon- Searching for PIL Reading http://www.review-board.org/downloads/mirror/ Reading http://www.review-board.org/downloads/nightlies/ Reading http://www.review-board.org/downloads/bleeding/ Best match: PIL 1.1.6 Downloading http://www.review-board.org/downloads/mirror/PIL-1.1.6.tar.gz Processing PIL-1.1.6.tar.gz Running PIL-1.1.6/setup.py -q bdist_egg --dist-dir /tmp/easy_install-zy1Wjh/PIL-1.1.6/egg-dist-tmp-6Gg9cV libImaging/Effects.c:210: warning: 'perlin_init' defined but not used libImaging/File.c: In function 'ImagingOpenPPM': libImaging/File.c:112: warning: ignoring return value of 'fread', declared with attribute warn_unused_result libImaging/File.c:119: warning: ignoring return value of 'fread', declared with attribute warn_unused_result libImaging/File.c: In function 'ImagingSaveRaw': libImaging/File.c:144: warning: ignoring return value of 'fwrite', declared with attribute warn_unused_result libImaging/File.c:151: warning: ignoring return value of 'fwrite', declared with attribute warn_unused_result libImaging/Geometry.c:236: warning: 'quadratic_transform' defined but not used libImaging/Quant.c: In function 'rehash_collide': libImaging/Quant.c:154: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size libImaging/Quant.c: At top level: libImaging/Quant.c:311: warning: 'test_sorted' defined but not used libImaging/QuantHash.c:136: warning: '_hashtable_test' defined but not used /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.1.2/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libz.so when searching for -lz /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.1.2/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libz.a when searching for -lz /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.1.2/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libpthread.so when searching for -lpthread /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.1.2/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libpthread.a when searching for -lpthread /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.1.2/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libc.so when searching for -lc /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.1.2/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libc.a when searching for -lc _imagingtk.c:20:16: error: tk.h: No such file or directory _imagingtk.c:23: error: expected ')' before '*' token _imagingtk.c:31: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before 'Tcl_Interp' _imagingtk.c: In function '_tkinit': _imagingtk.c:37: error: 'Tcl_Interp' undeclared (first use in this function) _imagingtk.c:37: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once _imagingtk.c:37: error: for each function it appears in.) _imagingtk.c:37: error: 'interp' undeclared (first use in this function) _imagingtk.c:45: error: expected expression before ')' token _imagingtk.c:51: error: 'TkappObject' has no member named 'interp' _imagingtk.c:55: warning: implicit declaration of function 'TkImaging_Init' error: Setup script exited with error: command 'gcc' failed with exit status 1 On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 6:12 AM, Christian Hammond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Hi everyone. > > We've just finished moving over to a new way of installing and upgrading > Review Board. > > Review Board, Djblets, Django-Evolution, PIL and Django are now packaged up > in such a way where you can install or upgrade them all with one command. > > Site installation and upgrading is also handled through a new tool, > rb-site. > > The new installation procedure is documented at > http://www.review-board.org/wiki/GettingStarted. It includes information > on migrating from existing installations. > > To sum up the new changes, basic installation has mostly become: > > $ sudo easy_install ReviewBoard > $ sudo rb-site install /var/www/reviews.example.com > > For the most part, nothing too fundamental has changed. It's just easier to > get going now. We are, however, considering some large changes within the > SVN tree that would break sites running out of the tree. This will probably > happen after 1.0, but may happen sooner if we decide it must be done. We > recommend that everybody makes an effort to move to the new install method. > > I've done a number of test installs without any problems, but if you hit an > issue, please let me know and I'll work to address it. > > Christian > > -- > Christian Hammond - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > VMware, Inc. > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
