If you went through rb-site install and select MySQL, you should never have
had to modify settings_local.py. You could just specify the existing
database information.

Did you set the directory permissions correctly? Which manual server updates
is it listing?

manage.py is no more, though you can do the equivalent using:

rb-site manage /path/to/site command -- params

However, the rb-site upgrade handles syncdb and evolve, so that's most of
what you'd ever need.

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VMware, Inc.


On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 7:35 PM, Lyndon Washington <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I went through and ran the initial install, then changed the db settings
> and ran the rb-site upgrade.
>
> It reported the following:
>
>> Rebuilding directory structure
>> Updating database
>> Installing json fixture 'initial_data' from
>> '/usr/local/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-0.9.dev_20081123-py2.4.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/fixtures'.
>> Installed 6 object(s) from 1 fixture(s)
>> No evolution required.
>>
>
> Unfortunately, when I try and go to the URL I get a message that *Manual
> server updates required*.
>
> I notice that the 'manage.py' is not in the newly created site directory.
> Is there a way to run that manually and point it at my site directories
> settings file?
>
> Cheers,
> -Lyndon-
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 9:49 PM, Lyndon Washington <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Cool! adding the tcl-devel and tk-devel allowed the build to occur.  Now I
>> am trying to use the old mysql db, rather than the new one that was
>> created.  It looks as if I just need to modify the settings_local.py in the
>> 'reviewboard/conf' folder.  Maybe run 'rb-site upgrade' ???
>>
>> Thanks for the prompt assistance this is most appreciated.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> -Lyndon-
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 9:32 PM, Christian Hammond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>>
>>> You could try installing the tcl8.4-dev and tk8.4-dev packages (or
>>> equivalent names on your system). This will hopefully allow it to compile.
>>>
>>> As far as PIL 1.1.5, you could definitely try installing the RPM. The
>>> issue is that PIL is marked as a dependency and easy_install may attempt to
>>> upgrade it to the known version. We could downgrade ours but there's no
>>> guarantee that'll solve anything, since there's otherwise a broken package
>>> in the PyPI package database that would cause other issues. But we're not
>>> explicitly requesting 1.1.6.
>>>
>>> Christian
>>>
>>> --
>>> Christian Hammond - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> VMware, Inc.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 6:22 PM, Lyndon Washington <
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Mmmm! On my system there is a dependency between python-tk and
>>>> python-devel.  python-devel is needed by python-setuptools.  Removing
>>>> python-tk will request that I remove the other two.
>>>>
>>>> Any other ideas?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>  -Lyndon-
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Christian Hammond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I've noticed this as well. Best solution is to remove the python-tk
>>>>> package from your system.
>>>>>
>>>>> Christian
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Christian Hammond - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> VMware, Inc.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 5:00 PM, Lyndon Washington <
>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I tried to move from a svn based install to the latest install and
>>>>>> unfortunately failed when easy_install tried to install the dependency of
>>>>>> PIL.
>>>>>> I have [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>> also an rpm for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The error is below.  Anything obvious to any python people (of which I
>>>>>> am not)?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> -Lyndon-
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Searching for PIL
>>>>>> Reading http://www.review-board.org/downloads/mirror/
>>>>>> Reading http://www.review-board.org/downloads/nightlies/
>>>>>> Reading http://www.review-board.org/downloads/bleeding/
>>>>>> Best match: PIL 1.1.6
>>>>>> Downloading
>>>>>> http://www.review-board.org/downloads/mirror/PIL-1.1.6.tar.gz
>>>>>> Processing PIL-1.1.6.tar.gz
>>>>>> Running PIL-1.1.6/setup.py -q bdist_egg --dist-dir
>>>>>> /tmp/easy_install-zy1Wjh/PIL-1.1.6/egg-dist-tmp-6Gg9cV
>>>>>> libImaging/Effects.c:210: warning: 'perlin_init' defined but not used
>>>>>> libImaging/File.c: In function 'ImagingOpenPPM':
>>>>>> libImaging/File.c:112: warning: ignoring return value of 'fread',
>>>>>> declared with attribute warn_unused_result
>>>>>> libImaging/File.c:119: warning: ignoring return value of 'fread',
>>>>>> declared with attribute warn_unused_result
>>>>>> libImaging/File.c: In function 'ImagingSaveRaw':
>>>>>> libImaging/File.c:144: warning: ignoring return value of 'fwrite',
>>>>>> declared with attribute warn_unused_result
>>>>>> libImaging/File.c:151: warning: ignoring return value of 'fwrite',
>>>>>> declared with attribute warn_unused_result
>>>>>> libImaging/Geometry.c:236: warning: 'quadratic_transform' defined but
>>>>>> not used
>>>>>> libImaging/Quant.c: In function 'rehash_collide':
>>>>>> libImaging/Quant.c:154: warning: cast to pointer from integer of
>>>>>> different size
>>>>>> libImaging/Quant.c: At top level:
>>>>>> libImaging/Quant.c:311: warning: 'test_sorted' defined but not used
>>>>>> libImaging/QuantHash.c:136: warning: '_hashtable_test' defined but not
>>>>>> used
>>>>>> /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.1.2/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld:
>>>>>> skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libz.so when searching for -lz
>>>>>> /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.1.2/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld:
>>>>>> skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libz.a when searching for -lz
>>>>>> /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.1.2/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld:
>>>>>> skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libpthread.so when searching for -lpthread
>>>>>> /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.1.2/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld:
>>>>>> skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libpthread.a when searching for -lpthread
>>>>>> /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.1.2/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld:
>>>>>> skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libc.so when searching for -lc
>>>>>> /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.1.2/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld:
>>>>>> skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libc.a when searching for -lc
>>>>>> _imagingtk.c:20:16: error: tk.h: No such file or directory
>>>>>> _imagingtk.c:23: error: expected ')' before '*' token
>>>>>> _imagingtk.c:31: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before
>>>>>> 'Tcl_Interp'
>>>>>> _imagingtk.c: In function '_tkinit':
>>>>>> _imagingtk.c:37: error: 'Tcl_Interp' undeclared (first use in this
>>>>>> function)
>>>>>> _imagingtk.c:37: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only
>>>>>> once
>>>>>> _imagingtk.c:37: error: for each function it appears in.)
>>>>>> _imagingtk.c:37: error: 'interp' undeclared (first use in this
>>>>>> function)
>>>>>> _imagingtk.c:45: error: expected expression before ')' token
>>>>>> _imagingtk.c:51: error: 'TkappObject' has no member named 'interp'
>>>>>> _imagingtk.c:55: warning: implicit declaration of function
>>>>>> 'TkImaging_Init'
>>>>>> error: Setup script exited with error: command 'gcc' failed with exit
>>>>>> status 1
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 6:12 AM, Christian Hammond <
>>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi everyone.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We've just finished moving over to a new way of installing and
>>>>>>> upgrading Review Board.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Review Board, Djblets, Django-Evolution, PIL and Django are now
>>>>>>> packaged up in such a way where you can install or upgrade them all 
>>>>>>> with one
>>>>>>> command.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Site installation and upgrading is also handled through a new tool,
>>>>>>> rb-site.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The new installation procedure is documented at
>>>>>>> http://www.review-board.org/wiki/GettingStarted. It includes
>>>>>>> information on migrating from existing installations.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To sum up the new changes, basic installation has mostly become:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    $ sudo easy_install ReviewBoard
>>>>>>>    $ sudo rb-site install /var/www/reviews.example.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For the most part, nothing too fundamental has changed. It's just
>>>>>>> easier to get going now. We are, however, considering some large changes
>>>>>>> within the SVN tree that would break sites running out of the tree. This
>>>>>>> will probably happen after 1.0, but may happen sooner if we decide it 
>>>>>>> must
>>>>>>> be done. We recommend that everybody makes an effort to move to the new
>>>>>>> install method.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've done a number of test installs without any problems, but if you
>>>>>>> hit an issue, please let me know and I'll work to address it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Christian
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Christian Hammond - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>> VMware, Inc.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to