Yes, we make some changes of RB to make it workable with our
repository. Briefly, two correction were done: first correction to
fetch file version from clearcase, second - job to fetch last changes
from clearcase (new activities, modified activities). It was quick hot
fix to lead RB to production mode.
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 7:43 AM, Dan Savilonis <d...@n-cube.org> wrote:
> Feel free to start a discussion on reviewboard-dev. I haven't put any
> active effort into improving support because I believe Clearcase is
> obsolete, but I'll certainly help with any questions you have.
> Michael -- I'm curious, are you using RB unmodified, or do you
> maintain a custom patchset to support your usage?
> On Dec 21, 7:59 am, David McCloskey <davemcclos...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I noticed on mine that when I make the review request, It makes a
>> reference to a /CHECKEDOUT in the path, which means that when that
>> file is checked in, the review request will be broken. Is that
>> intended? If so, it's not good. Is there some place where discussion
>> can be made about how to change this? I'm willing to put some time in
>> to change how this works to make it work better.
>> On Dec 20, 7:15 am, Michael Zhilin <miz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi Dan, Nitin,
>> > I would like to explain how we use ReviewBoard with ClearCase. Each
>> > project contains 2 CC streams: for development and for integration. We
>> > review only changes of development stream. Changes with same activity
>> > headline are posted in one review request. Nobody creates review
>> > requests. Review requests are created by special cron job which makes
>> > monitoring of development stream. All review comments are sent to
>> > development and tracked by internal issue tracking system.
>> > I'm happy with ReviewBoard. It is perfect tool. But there is lack of
>> > IDE integration for more flexible code review now (Eclipse+Mylyn).
>> > Sincerely yours,
>> > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Dan Savilonis <d...@n-cube.org> wrote:
>> > > Hi Nitin,
>> > > There are some instructions in the documentation on setting up Review
>> > > Board for ClearCase which you should start with, as well as various
>> > > threads you can search for in the mailing list. However, I'd recommend
>> > > you find someone who is comfortable with ClearCase and cleartool to
>> > > set it up. The process is not as smooth or flexible as with other VCS.
>> > > ClearCase does not fit well into the Review Board model and though
>> > > there seem to be a number of users out there, I haven't seen a lot of
>> > > feedback on how well it works for them.
>> > > Dan
>> > > On Dec 15, 3:06 am, Nitin GUpta <nit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> My company is using Clear Case for repository, I have very little
>> > >> understanding of clearcase. While searching i found that clearcase
>> > >> could be supported by Review Board. So we installed Review Board. But
>> > >> unable to configure the clearcase settings.
>> > >> Could anyone of you please help me to setup Review Board for Clearcase.
>> > > --
>> > > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today
>> > > athttp://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
>> > > Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> > > -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
>> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> > > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>> > > For more options, visit this group
>> > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> For more options, visit this group at
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at