dear sirs.
my remarks are on your comments 
"nRTI activists. What you also probably do not know is that the Mir Jafar's 
stuffing the foolish little heads of RTI activists (and thereby altering the 
laws of India indirectly) with such nonsensical and foolish proposals are all 
former (disgraced) bureaucrats (now foreign financed touts) to prevent RTI from 
taking root in Bharat (that is India) - a prime strategy of which is to 
Overload the RTI systems / infrastructure of Govt. till it grinds down and then 
collapses - resulting in Maoism etc."

Kindly remember one strike of bihar Govt employee for a month , no one really 
trouble by the Govt employee strike.
secondly attitude of Government employee is changing for better.
thirdly siphoning of fund from Govt is reducing by this Act. All the check and 
balances were unable improve the siphoning off fund from the Government in the 
past. Kindly see number of Government employee suspended for corruption(less 
than hundred) and amount of corruption in Government (varry from the estimate 
of 50% to 85%).
fourthly ,  every change/action  for the betterment of poor/ under priviliged  
is look excessive by the privlege class(in this Govt Employee) , now, they are 
answerable for their actions.
fiftly, expenditure on RTI is less than gain received by it in reducing 
corruption and inefficiecy.
lastly, i want to know, which part of RTI is not needed as per your assessment 
and why.
with regards
rakesh gupta

sarbajit roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:                             Dear Ms. 
Sharma,
 
 1)  Kindly stop sending such emails which "CC:" all the receipients. You will 
be identified as a"spammer" and by replying to everyone so will I. It would be 
better to use the "BCC" option or to form a Yahoo group of your own. But please 
keep sending emails by all means to me.
 
 2) I would be obliged to be informed the specific Rule or other binding 
provision of Law whereby Money Orders are allowable for section 6 RTI 
applications - since what you are proposing is legally dubious based on an 
illiterate reading of "cash against proper receipt" in the Central RTI Fee & 
Cost Rules. and is contraindicated by other sections of RTI Act which no doubt 
IC A.N.Tewari will expose if such matters come before him in Complaint and 
thereby again set back RTI by another 5 years. The States of India (we are a 
Federation after all) may have different views on MO and may allow it.
 
 3) I am sure that you remember that around Dec 2007 the Trade Union 
constituted (illegally) under (s.12.4) an Inter-State Committee to hammer 
foolish
 RTI activists. What you also probably do not know is that the Mir Jafar's 
stuffing the foolish little heads of RTI activists (and thereby altering the 
laws of India indirectly) with such nonsensical and foolish proposals are all 
former (disgraced) bureaucrats (now foreign financed touts) to prevent RTI from 
taking root in Bharat (that is India) - a prime strategy of which is to 
Overload the RTI systems / infrastructure of Govt. till it grinds down and then 
collapses - resulting in Maoism etc.
 
 Sarbajit
 
 urvashi sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: we all should spread use of money 
order at grassroot level to make it
 successful mode.if the pio returns it then one should immediately file
 complaint u/s 18( 1 ) .
 
 returning the money order is gross violation of section 5(3) and 7(4)
 of the act and attracts action under penalty clause of the act.
 
 but dont forget to write your address on the form in the space for
 communication. to save space when u start and write address of the pio
 in left hand side write your address in the right hand side .this way
 u have to put only  ur signatures in the end of the form. moreover use
 both sides of the leaf as that shall be given to the pio by the postal
 department.the pio is dutybound as per section 5(3) and 7(4) of the
 act to entertain such requests and put them in the form he thinks
 shall help in furnishing the information conveniently as per the act.
 
 postal department should also come up with special types of money
 order forms having more space for communication as a step towards the
 noble cause of spreadind transparancy and fighting corruption.
 
 asking information by money order has one more important aspect .this
 is the only mode where an open application initiates its journey i.e.
 a road towards transparancy.
 
 let's spread money order in whole of country
 
 suggestions are welcome
 
 thanks
 
 urvashi
 urvashi sharma
 
 ---------------------------------
 Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.
 
 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
 
 
     
                                       

       
---------------------------------
 Share files, take polls, and discuss your passions - all under one roof.  
Click here.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to