thanks for your reply. however, you had sidelined the following points in your reply. secondly attitude of Government employee is changing for better. > thirdly siphoning of fund from Govt is reducing by this Act. All the check and balances were unable improve the siphoning off fund from the Government in the past. Kindly see number of Government employee suspended for corruption(less than hundred) and amount of corruption in Government (varry from the estimate of 50% to 85%). > fourthly , every change/action for the betterment of poor/ under priviliged is look excessive by the privlege class(in this Govt Employee) , now, they are answerable for their actions. > fiftly, expenditure on RTI is less than gain received by it in reducing corruption and inefficiecy. > lastly, i want to know, which part of RTI is not needed as per your assessment and why. kindly do the needful. with regards rakesh
sroy1947 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Rakesh, Its nice to hear from you again. 1) I think we safely eliminate all departments of taxation and revenue from government. So IT, VAT, TIN, ST, Excise, Customs, Ent.Tax etc can be beheaded. Of course all IRS Officers, CA's and Tax Advocates will be unemployed but they can easily turn to RTI and win Magsaysay awards and "aish karo" in foreign countries like Mexico and US where they are taken for training and debriefing by their foreign spymasters. 2) I think we can eliminate the Police Department. You may remember about 25 years back there was a police strike in Delhi - the army was called in and manned the Police Stations. Crime rate came down to 5% of normal - half of whom arrested were cops. Once the police returned to duty the cases registered at those times have still not come up for trial. 3) I think that the President of India lives in too big a house for such a small family. Her bodyguards can be eliminated because no-one would wish to eliminate our beloved Prez. 4) I think we can also eliminate the the LG of Delhi. It is a useless and purely ceremonial post as per the Constitution of India. 5) Or in the alternative, because we dont want all ths worthy people above to become Maoists, we can simply eliminate the RTI Act, disband the Information Commissions and live peacefully - since we hardly get any worthwhile information in any case but have to pay salaries,perks and pensions for useless Information Commissioners. We can keep adding to this list. Sarbajit --- In [email protected], RAKESH GUPTA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > dear sirs. > my remarks are on your comments > "nRTI activists. What you also probably do not know is that the Mir Jafar's stuffing the foolish little heads of RTI activists (and thereby altering the laws of India indirectly) with such nonsensical and foolish proposals are all former (disgraced) bureaucrats (now foreign financed touts) to prevent RTI from taking root in Bharat (that is India) - a prime strategy of which is to Overload the RTI systems / infrastructure of Govt. till it grinds down and then collapses - resulting in Maoism etc." > > Kindly remember one strike of bihar Govt employee for a month , no one really trouble by the Govt employee strike. > secondly attitude of Government employee is changing for better. > thirdly siphoning of fund from Govt is reducing by this Act. All the check and balances were unable improve the siphoning off fund from the Government in the past. Kindly see number of Government employee suspended for corruption(less than hundred) and amount of corruption in Government (varry from the estimate of 50% to 85%). > fourthly , every change/action for the betterment of poor/ under priviliged is look excessive by the privlege class(in this Govt Employee) , now, they are answerable for their actions. > fiftly, expenditure on RTI is less than gain received by it in reducing corruption and inefficiecy. > lastly, i want to know, which part of RTI is not needed as per your assessment and why. > with regards > rakesh gupta > --------------------------------- Get the freedom to save as many mails as you wish. Click here to know how. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
