No proof of citizenship is asked  for  employment  even in Govt. service.
  No proof of citizenship is demanded when a person's name is included in the 
voters' list. When a person goes to a Court to file a case or to a Police 
Station to lodge a complaint, no proof of citizenship is required to be 
attached.  One can go on like this.
   
   Asking for proof of citizenship is only to delay/deny information and goes 
against the letter and spirit of the Act.
  

LESLIE ALMEIDA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
          upto date nobdoy asked me for proof of my nationality (citizenship )
i have many proofs, passport ration card, Pan card,&nbsp; voters ID card
but my maid from cathisghad working with me in mumbai does not possess 
passport, ration card, pan card voters id card, how will she use RTI if 
required.
&nbsp;
leslie almeida

--- On Wed, 6/4/08, Nidhi Sharma &lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]&gt; wrote:

From: Nidhi Sharma &lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]&gt;
Subject: Re: [rti_india] Re: Proving Indian citizenship
To: [email protected]
Date: Wednesday, June 4, 2008, 8:12 PM

Thanks a lot everyone for this response. But somehow I do not agree with 
Sarbajit's justification of this. When it is not a mandatory document required 
along with the application (which is given on a plain paper), then why should 
this be demanded by the PIO? It could be only in the rarest of rare cases when 
there is doubt about nationality. Thankfully it has been put on record by IC 
OPK with a carefully worded decision.

sroy1947 &lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED] com&gt; wrote: Dear Nidhi,

The MHA used to have this condition their website - citizenship proof
to be submitted along with application.

Personally,I feel that there is nothing wrong with demanding proof of
citizenship before releasing the information. For example the Supreme
Court PIO recently refused to allow me to file an RTI on similar
ground. After all the RTI Act is about empowering citizens, and a
prudent PIO is well within his authority to formally request proof of
citizenship. This BTW does not contradict another clause of RTI Act
that the applicant is not required to disclose his details other than
his name and contact particulars.

However, when this requirement is used to deny / delay information or
REFUSE to accept RTI (as SC with me) then the PIO is certainly liable
to penalty.

Sarbajit

--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ps.com, Nidhi Sharma &lt;nidhi_sharma@ ...&gt; wrote:
&gt;
&gt; Sarbajit and everyone on the list
&gt; 
&gt; Is there anyone on this list who has filed an RTI application and
has been asked by the public authority to prove his/ her Indian
citizenship? If so, could you please tell me the public authority and
if you have approached the first appellate authority or CIC over this?
&gt; 
&gt; Regards
&gt; Nidhi
&gt; 
&gt; 
&gt; 
&gt; [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
&gt;

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



                           

       
---------------------------------
 Download prohibited? No problem. CHAT from any browser, without download.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to