-For requestting information under RTIAct 2005 one does not have to 
produce any proof of Indian cityzenship. Section 6(2) of the Act is 
amply clear.   It says that " An applicant making request for 
informtion shall not be required to give any reasons for requesting 
the informtion or  ANY OTHER PERSONAL DETAILS  except that that may 
be necessary for contacting him."  Where does it say that one has to 
produce  proof of  Indian cityzenship with his application?







-- In [email protected], C K Jam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> At the cost of repeating myself (Sarabjit, sorry for this, but need 
to clarify once again), please do not confuse between :
> 
> Proof of Identity
> Proof of Address
> Proof of Citizenship
> 
> They are 3 completely different issues.
> 
> As someone posted earlier, in the absence of a Citizens Register or 
a system of National ID cards, there is no way one can conclusively 
prove that he/she is a Citizen of India.
> Probably, that is why, even after 3 days, no one has answered my 
fundamental question:
> 
> How does one conclusively prove that he /she is a citizen of India ?
> 
> RTIwanted
> 
> --- On Fri, 6/6/08, MALLAPRAGADA RAMARAO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> From: MALLAPRAGADA RAMARAO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [rti_india] Re: Proving Indian citizenship
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Friday, June 6, 2008, 2:31 AM
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>     
>             I worked in 3 semi-autonomous organisations and the 
last one was through UPSC.
> 
>    
> 
>   It is true my antecedents were got verified and I have to take an 
oath of allegiance to Indian Constitution, before joining duty, but 
never was I asked to produce  any proof of my citizenship.  The 
applications contained a column to furnish my  address but not any 
proof  of the same, as far as I can remember after all these years.
> 
>    
> 
>   When a person applies for Passport also, citizenship document is 
required only if the applicant is a citizen of India by Registration 
or Naturalisation.
> 
>    
> 
>   Income Tax Department is also issuing PAN without asking for  
proof of citizenship.
> 
> Manoj Pai [EMAIL PROTECTED] com&gt; wrote:
> 
>           I am afraid you are wrong Mr Mallapragada Ramarao. All
> 
> appointment in Government Services is as per
> 
> Government Servants Act 1935 and now referred to
> 
> Article 309 of the Constitution of India. As you must
> 
> be aware that there are separate recruitment agencies
> 
> like Staff Selection Commission, UPSC etc. who carry
> 
> out examination, seek information on you
> 
> identification, proof of address etc. Its takes a
> 
> while to pass this process. Though rules for certain
> 
> banks, defense etc. vary.
> 
> 
> 
> Later at the time of appointment, the appointing
> 
> authority further seek yet another set of documents
> 
> like proof of address, reference of two know people in
> 
> the area, medical fitness test etc. You are finally
> 
> given the appointment order only after the police
> 
> verification certificate is provided to the
> 
> appointment authority.
> 
> 
> 
> This list has a few retired IAS/IPS officers, who
> 
> should be able to shed some more light on this issue.
> 
> 
> 
> Manoj
> 
> --- MALLAPRAGADA RAMARAO [EMAIL PROTECTED] co.in&gt;
> 
> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> &gt; No proof of citizenship is asked for employment 
> 
> &gt; even in Govt. service.
> 
> &gt; No proof of citizenship is demanded when a
> 
> &gt; person's name is included in the voters' list. When
> 
> &gt; a person goes to a Court to file a case or to a
> 
> &gt; Police Station to lodge a complaint, no proof of
> 
> &gt; citizenship is required to be attached. One can go
> 
> &gt; on like this.
> 
> &gt; 
> 
> &gt; Asking for proof of citizenship is only to
> 
> &gt; delay/deny information and goes against the letter
> 
> &gt; and spirit of the Act.
> 
> 
> 
> ------------ --------- --------- ---
> 
>  Best Jokes, Best Friends, Best Food. Get all this and more on  
Best of Yahoo! Groups.
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 
> 
> 
> 
>       
> 
>     
>     
>       
>        
>       
>       
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>       
> 
> 
>       
>       
> 
> 
>       
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>


Reply via email to