Hold the phone...  I need to address a point right now.  I am NOT looking to 
sell or market turnouts to compete with Tom's Turnouts.  Don't know where that 
idea came from.  I am just looking for the best solution for my personal 
layout. Having said that, I may try to replicate the frog insert, or I may just 
run everything with large flanges and gauge the turnouts appropriately.  The 
flanges don't bother me.  Everything I own currently (other than my Flyonel 
Mikado) is SHS so I can easily swap to the larger flanges.  I love scale, but 
the new Flyonel offerings, and the rumors I hear about new Flyonel scale 
engines to come make me want to build my layout to run them too. I think I may 
be better served to just accept the larger flanges and gauge my turnouts 
accordingly.  All SHS, AM, RR(0-6-0), and even Sunset 4-6-2 (if made) products 
have large flange options.  That's what I am thinking right now, unless someone 
offers a better solution.

Regards,
Jonathan

Blogs: http://RailfanX.blogspot.com and http://cloudvirt.blogspot.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/jonnyspeed
Linked In: http://www.linkedin.com/in/jhatfield



From: Tom Hawley 
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 2:12 PM
To: [email protected] 
Subject: {S-Scale List} Being all things to all wheel profiles.


  
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Jonathan Hatfield
. . . . . . . . . . .I checked with Tom [Stoltz] about getting some turnouts 
built and he . . . . . . . .won’t be taking any new orders for a while. So 
since I want to be able to run both scale wheels and modern Flyonel flanges 
. . . . . . . . . .
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
When I was young and foolish I thought the same thing. Being today older 
( and ??? ), I've decided on scale only. It makes life a lot easier.
< < < < < < < < < < < < <
I think my only option is going to be hand-laying my own and experimenting 
with the flangeways until I get a good compromise. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 
. . .
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
I doubt that your good compromise will be reliable for scale or high-rail. 
Here are two other suggestions -

ONE. Study carefully the frog insert on the Tom's Turnouts. Maybe you can 
recreate - whittle, cast, ?? - these for yourself. They are key to running 
scale and high-rail together, and they work, as the SMSG club demonstrated 
again yesterday at the Monroe Michigan train show. You should be able to do 
this for yourself with no problem, but before you start selling them, talk 
to your lawyer or work out an understanding with Mr Stoltz.

TWO. Look at the latest version of the SHS turnout and note the swing-nose 
frog (moving frog point). There is no gap and therefore no flangeway 
dimension to be concerned with. And I don't think SHS has a patent on that 
idea, since it's been used in certain real world heavy-haul and high-speed 
track applications for a long time, world-wide. Make your own turnouts 
using this system at any degree of divergence ("number") that works for your 
railroad.

Tom Hawley
http://michmod.com





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to